ibusinesslines.com
ibusinesslines.com December 18, 2017


Supreme Court OKs Trump Travel Ban Pending Lower Court Rulings

05 December 2017, 01:26 | Jodi Jackson

Supreme Court allows full enforcement of Trump travel ban while legal challenges continue

US President Donald Trump Travel Ban

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his latest travel ban targeting people from six Muslim-majority countries to go into full effect even as legal challenges continue in lower courts.

Instead of previous temporary travel bans, the president now "has imposed an indefinite one, deepening and prolonging the harms a stay would inflict", says the brief submitted on Hawaii's behalf by Washington lawyer Neal Katyal. Critics have called it anti-Muslim, while the Trump administration touts it as a measure to combat terrorism.

For example, a New York Times piece described this new method of deciding cases as "a set of restrictions on presidential action that only apply to Donald Trump".

Solicitor General Noel Francisco, representing the Trump administration, argued just the opposite.


This is not a final ruling on the travel ban: Challenges to the policy are winding through the federal courts, and the justices themselves ultimately are expected to rule on its legality. "These differences confirm that the Proclamation is based on national-security and foreign-affairs objectives, not religious animus", he wrote.

The videos, posted by Jayda Fransen, the deputy leader of Britain First, a far-right and ultra-nationalist political group, depict purported Muslims assaulting people and, in one video, smashing a statue of the Virgin Mary.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor were the only two justices who would have left the lower court orders in place. The other two are North Korea and Venezuela. But a three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals partially lifted that order. The second version of the ban was permitted to go into limited effect in June after review by the Supreme Court, but key provisions only last for 90 and 120 days.

"Thanks! See you in court next week", wrote Katyal.



Other News

Trending Now

Broadcom fires board broadside from shaky platform
Yes, they are trying to replace entire Qualcomm's board to make them accept this offer. Broadcom named a slate of 11 nominees it wants to put on Qualcomm's board .

Homeless man rescues children from burning apartment
The department said without Angulo's help, the children would have likely suffered severe smoke inhalation and burns. Through the smoke, Angulo could see the leg of an infant on the floor, so he pulled the infant out of harm's way.

AG, DA ask victims in Senate probe to reach out
Rosenberg has promised to recuse himself from any matters related to the investigation but otherwise will continue to preside over the Senate.

Warriors' Shaun Livingston suspended one game for altercation on Sunday
But, upon further review, the league seems to have determined Kirkland was the more guilty party. It did look like from watching that Courtney stepped into his face and he tossed him out".

Best man for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's wedding revealed
Additionally, there is precedent for this, as the pair performed these ceremonial duties earlier this year at Pippa Middleton's wedding.

U.S. teacher reports Muslim boy with Down syndrome for 'terrorism'
This is so stupid, this is discrimination actually. "It's not implied discrimination, it's a hundred per cent discrimination". The police later confirmed an investigation did take place but it was found there was no need for them to be involved.

Tom Brady: Frustration likely sparked Rob Gronkowski's late hit
McDermott appears to confront Belichick about the hit and Belichick responds by saying "I understand, it was bullshit, i'm sorry". Third-string quarterback Joe Webb had three carries for 27 yards as the Bills introduced a wildcat wrinkle to their offense.