TODAY'S FORECAST: Mostly sunny, chance of scattered showers and thunderstorms
Accused NSA leaker back in court Tuesday
Teenage girl rushed to hospital after plummeting from theme park ride
Where can you celebrate the Fourth in Lake Country?
QATAR, GULF CRISIS: US calls for talks to end diplomatic row
Boost To Redskins Case: Supreme Court Says Government Can't Refuse Disparaging Trademarks
20 June 2017, 09:51 | Laverne Osborne
A Sukhoi Su-27 fighter jet performs during an aviation show outside Moscow
This Supreme Court ruling is a victory for that Asian-American rock band.
Simon Tam, founder and bassist of the Oregon-based band, had sought registration by the Patent and Trademark Office in order to "reclaim" the term from being a derogatory reference to people of Asian origin. The Slants had been denied trademark protection for their name under the Lanham Act. Shortly after that, the Tam case was headed to the Supreme Court, and Washington appealed for their own Supreme Court hearing, ahead of any decision by the Fourth Circuit.
The court ruled 8-0 to throw out a federal prohibition on disparaging trademarks, saying that was a violation of First Amendment rights.
The justices said part of a law that bars the government from registering disparaging trademarks violates free speech rights.
'After an excruciating legal battle that has spanned almost eight years, we're beyond humbled and thrilled to have won this case at the Supreme Court, ' they said in a statementposted to their website on Monday.
The Redskins filed an amicus brief supporting the Supreme Court case brought by The Slants. The same is true for the Redskins, but the team did not want to lose the legal protections that go along with a registered trademark.
"The Supreme Court has held that Congress can not keep disparaging trademarks out of the federal registration program", they said, "but the Court did nothing to cast doubt on the prior judicial findings that the Washington NFL team's name and trademarks disparage Native Americans". The case featured an Asian rock band the Slants and a trademark denial they had received.
Justice Neil Gorsuch did not rule on the case as he was not on the court when the case was argued.
The law used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to prevent the National Football League team from registering trademarks in and relating to the word "Redskins" and the logos used by the team was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has upheld negative speech in recent years, even when it involved distasteful protests at military funerals or disgusting "animal crush" videos.
"I am thrilled! Hail to the Redskins", Snyder said in a statement to CSN Mid-Atlantic.
The appeals court ruling led the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to appeal to the Supreme Court with the argument that trademarks are government speech, not private speech, and trademarks should be considered either a form of government subsidy or a government program, but not a citizen's "free speech".
But in a unanimous vote, the Supreme Court said that law violates free expression.
Tropical Storm Bret heads towards Trinidad
This is a classic rainmaker tropical system, with a large area of rain surrounding a poorly organized low pressure center . The 1933 Trinidad hurricane didn't form until June 24, and 1979's Tropical Storm Ana formed in the same region on June 20.
Stars of 'Jumanji' sequel pay tribute to Robin Williams
But co-star Jack Black has revealed exactly how Williams' character Alan Parrish will play into the plot of the Jumanji sequel. The news of the film has previously been met with harsh criticism due to the announcement following close to William's death.
Ronaldo summoned to court, Mourinho accused of tax fraud
The question of Ronaldo using tactics to get the club to pay for a possible fine makes no sense because he is not like that. We have not had an offer from Cristiano. the Sheikh at PSG is a friend of mine and he hasn't called me nor have we talked.